How Standardized Tests Shape—and Limit –Student Learning
Article Summary: This
article looks at the negative effects on student learning through standardized
testing. It says that although these tests are not in themselves high-stakes
tests, they are used as such. The article focuses on the limitations, especially
in ELA, that these tests embody. It is difficult to measure true ELA outcomes because
this type of test mostly focuses on reading comprehension and writing as
multiple choice items. The article also states that subjects such as foreign
language, music, art, and social sciences are left out of these types of tests
and that hey focus mostly on computational skill. These tests are also hard for
teachers as they must gear their teaching toward mastery of standardized test
and not other important tasks. This type of test is being used to shape the curriculum and the types of
learning that go on in the classroom and teachers are losing valuable teaching
time. The end of the article does give some solutions to using these
standardized tests as such a high stakes test by allowing multiple formative
and summative tests and using these tests along with other tests, not just as
an end-all type of assessment for teachers and students alike.
Interpretation: I
think this article gives a good glimpse of the limitations set by standardized
tests for all involved. I know that in my own experience with taking tests like
the SAT, GRE, PRAXIS, etc. that they are not true measures of a person’s skill.
I am not a great test-taker and my test anxiety pretty much takes over as soon
as I sit down in the test room. I think that the best advice given in this
article is to use standardized tests ALONG WITH other types of tests. I remember
that a portion of the GRE was to write an essay which would then be scored by
some sort of panel of experts. I am, by no means, a great writer, but I am not
a poor writer either. It is difficult, though, to be given a topic and a time
limit to shape a good and effective essay without the time to revise and
re-revise your text. I think writing is a process and not a product as soon as
it hits the paper. A student should be allowed the time to collect their
thoughts and not just vomit words onto paper in their 45-minute allotted time
slot, that’s just messy no matter how you take it. It is also concerning that
we are teaching toward reading comprehension and not toward a greater
understanding in literacy. If teachers are to prepare students for higher
education, we are doing them no favors by teaching solely to comprehension.
Higher education is all about critical thinking, unpacking meaning, and every
other new-fangled buzzword that relates to extracting the hidden agendas inside
of a text. We want to create feeling, thinking, compassionate beings, not just
tiny yes-men. I will never agree with or understand the concept of trying to
fit 100 different individuals into the same-sized box. If we are all created
differently, how can we be judged by an invariably standard test? Nonsense!